| Diaz v Rodriguez |
| 2004 NY Slip Op 07253 [11 AD3d 258] |
| October 12, 2004 |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Liberto Diaz et al., Appellants, v Blasina Rodriguez, Also Known as Blasina Ortiz, Respondent. |
—[*1]Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered July 8, 2003, which denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs defaulted when they failed to notify defendant as to their ability to obtain a mortgage by the deadline and proceed to closing. In light of that breach of contract, they were not entitled to recover their down payment (see Maxton Bldrs. v Lo Galbo, 68 NY2d 373 [1986]).
We have considered plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Saxe and Lerner, JJ.