Romanowski v Geico Cas. Co.
2004 NY Slip Op 09996 [13 AD3d 1236]
Decided on December 30, 2004
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 30, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, SMITH, AND HAYES, JJ.

[*1]

1726 CA 04-01600 MARK ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V ORDER

v

GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (James W. McCarthy, A.J.), entered October 3, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action and denied plaintiff's cross motion for leave to amend the complaint.


HANCOCK & ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (ASHLEY D. HAYES OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
MELVIN & MELVIN, PLLC, SYRACUSE (DOUGLAS H. YOUNG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 30, 2004
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court