| Pointer v Racco |
| 2004 NY Slip Op 50558(U) |
| Decided on June 3, 2004 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal by plaintiff, on grounds of inadequacy, from a small claims judgment of the Civil Court, Kings County (A. Schack, J.), entered on March 27, 2003, following a trial, awarding her $500.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In our opinion, substantial justice was done between the parties according to the
RE:TANSHEL POINTER v ROCCO RACCO
rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804, 1807) in this small claims action
seeking the return of a security deposit.
[*2]
Decision Date: June 03, 2004