| Leonard v Clove Val. Rod & Gun Club, Inc. |
| 2005 NY Slip Op 01325 [15 AD3d 547] |
| February 22, 2005 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Edwin Deane Leonard et al., Plaintiffs, v Clove Valley Rod & Gun Club, Inc., Defendants. (And Third-Party Actions.) (Action No. 1.) Edwin Deane Leonard et al., appellants, v James Daly et al., respondents. (Action No. 2.) |
—[*1]In related actions for judgments declaring, inter alia, that the lawful boundary lines between two adjoining parcels of real property were as set forth in a map filed with the Dutchess County Clerk, the plaintiffs in action No. 2 appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 31, 2003, which, inter alia, declared that the boundaries between the adjoining parcels were as set forth in a map prepared by the defendants' expert.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court's resolution of this boundary-line dispute was supported by the weight of the credible evidence, and thus, we decline to disturb it (see Schweitzer v Heppner, 212 AD2d 835 [1995]; Stratton v Keefe, 191 AD2d 871 [1993]). [*2]
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.