Acevedo v New York City Tr. Auth.
2005 NY Slip Op 01636 [16 AD3d 144]
March 3, 2005
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 18, 2005


Moises Acevedo, Appellant,
v
New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul A. Victor, J.), entered September 12, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant's failure to timely answer the complaint was adequately explained as attributable to excusable law office failure and resulted in no discernible prejudice to plaintiff (see Leary v Pou Poune, Inc., 273 AD2d 8 [2000]). In view of this, and the showing of a meritorious defense made out by the affidavit of defendant's motorman, the default was properly vacated. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.