Lawson v Howard Sys. Intl.
2005 NY Slip Op 08042 [23 AD3d 177]
November 1, 2005
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006


Richard J. Lawson, Appellant,
v
Howard Systems International et al., Respondents.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered August 2, 2004, which, in an action for employment discrimination on the basis of race, insofar as appealed from as limited by plaintiff's brief, denied plaintiff's motion pursuant to Judiciary Law § 519 to hold defendants in criminal contempt for having terminated plaintiff's employment on account of his absence from work by reason of jury service, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Even assuming the claim was properly entertained as an unpleaded cause of action, the motion was properly denied. No private cause of action exists under Judiciary Law § 519 (Gomariz v Foote, Cone & Belding Communications, 228 AD2d 316 [1996]). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.