Pisanelli v Town of E. Fishkill
2005 NY Slip Op 08694 [23 AD3d 446]
November 14, 2005
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006


Robert Pisanelli, Appellant,
v
Town of East Fishkill, Respondent.

[*1]In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated October 20, 2004, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In response to the defendant's showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant (see Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 484 [1997]; Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432, 437-440 [1986]; Steward v Town of Clarkstown, 224 AD2d 405 [1996]; cf. Siegel v City of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 488-489 [1997]).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.