| Ciura v Muto |
| 2005 NY Slip Op 09842 [24 AD3d 1329] |
| Decided on December 22, 2005 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 22, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, MARTOCHE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1405 CA 05-00720
[*1]STANLEY J. CIURA, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF IRENE CIURA, DECEASED, ET AL., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, ORDER
v
RICHARD MUTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. —————————————————————-
ROBERT H. MATHEIS, ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v
RICHARD MUTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. —————————————————————- ZDARSKY, SAWICKI & AGOSTINELLI, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph G. Makowski, J.), entered December 29, 2004. The order, inter alia, granted plaintiffs' motion for appointment of a judgment receiver.
ZDARSKY, SAWICKI & AGOSTINELLI, BUFFALO (K. MICHAEL SAWICKI OF COUNSEL), APPELLANT PRO SE.
HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (CATHERINE GRANTIER COOLEY OF COUNSEL), DUKE, HOLZMAN, YAEGER & PHOTIADIS LLP, AND DAMON & MOREY, LLP, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CORECEIVERS IN THE CLASS ACTION.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 22, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court