[*1]
Forest Hills S. Owners Inc. v Wing Keung Kong
2005 NYSlipOp 50623(U)
Decided on April 26, 2005
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on April 26, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: April 26, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.
2003-860 Q C

Forest Hills South Owners Inc., Appellant, -

against

Wing Keung Kong, Respondent.


Appeal by landlord from an order of the Civil Court, Queens County (P. Jackman-Brown, J.), entered on May 23, 2003, which in effect vacated a warrant of eviction, dismissed the petition and denied, without prejudice to landlord bringing a plenary action, its application for attorney's fees, late charges and maintenance.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Contrary to landlord's contention, the warrant was properly vacated for good cause shown (RPAPL 749 [3]) based upon landlord's acceptance of rent after issuance of the warrant of eviction, tenant's reasonable dispute over the amount actually owed and the confusion concerning the failure of tenant's prior attorney to deposit the judgment amount in the court below. [*2]

Contrary to landlord's argument, the court below did not fail to abide by the order of this court since the temporary stay conditioned upon depositing the sum of $2,188.16 in the court below terminated when tenant failed to deposit said sum in accordance with our order.

Finally, we find that the court below providently exercised its discretion in denying landlord's application, without prejudice to landlord bringing a plenary action, for attorney's fees, late charges and maintenance which allegedly accrued after the parties entered into the stipulation settling the proceeding.
Decision Date: April 26, 2005