[*1]
Nales v Kader
2005 NYSlipOp 50862(U)
Decided on June 3, 2005
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on June 3, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: June 3, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS PRESENT : PESCE, P.J., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.
2004-769 Q C

Yoralma Nales, an infant by her mother and natural guardian, ALMA RODRIGUEZ, Respondent,

against

Claudine Kader, Defendant. CLAUDINE KADER, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, MARIA ROSA, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal by third-party defendant from an order of the Civil Court, Queens County (J. Golia, J.), entered on March 25, 2004, which denied her cross motion for summary judgment and from a companion order of the same court, entered on March 25, 2004, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment.


Orders unanimously reversed without costs and defendant's motion and third-party defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint and third-party complaint, respectively, granted.

The so-ordered stipulation entered into between the parties required the injured infant [*2]plaintiff to appear for a deposition on or before October 31, 2003, or "be precluded from offering any evidence or testimony at the time of trial." The so-ordered stipulation functioned as a conditional order of preclusion which became absolute upon the injured plaintiff's failure to comply (see Coleman v Thompson, 5 Misc 3d 136[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51543[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]). Under the circumstances, plaintiff is unable to establish a prima facie case and the defendant's motion and third-party defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's complaint and the third-party complaint, respectively, should have been granted.
Decision Date: June 03, 2005