Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Criminal Court, Kings County (D. Chun, J.), rendered September 26, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]) and imposing sentence.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.

As defendant received the sentence for which he bargained, he has no ground to complain that said sentence was excessive (e.g. People v Domin, 13 AD3d 391 [2004]; People v Fanelli, 8 AD3d 296 [2004]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence did not constitute an abuse of sentencing discretion, nor should the sentence be modified in the interest of justice. In our view, defendant's prior conviction of a more serious offense of a similar nature and the salutatory conditions of his probation render the instant sentence entirely appropriate (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Decision Date: June 07, 2005