| Vega v Carlino |
| 2005 NYSlipOp 51308(U) |
| Decided on August 11, 2005 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the Civil Court, Queens County (B. Siegal, J.), entered on October 14, 2003, which dismissed his action.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this small claims action to recover unpaid rent, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law (UCCA 1804, 1807; see Ross v Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]).
Decision Date: August 11, 2005