[*1]
Pandya v Korolev
2005 NY Slip Op 51469(U) [9 Misc 3d 127(A)]
Decided on September 16, 2005
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on September 16, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: September 16, 2005 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE TERM : 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS PRESENT : PATTERSON, J.P., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.
2004-1534 RI C

Rajeev K. Pandya, Respondent,

against

Yuriy Korolev Respondent, -and- ELENA SOKOLOVA, Appellant.


Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Pierre B. Turner, J.), entered November 3, 2004. The order denied tenant Sokolova's motion to vacate the final judgment in a holdover summary proceeding and restore the case to the calendar.


Appeal unanimously dismissed.

In this holdover summary proceeding, the sole issue raised on appeal is whether the warrant could properly issue, due to appellant's alleged failure to timely pay rent and use and occupancy awards, prior to the December 31, 2004 expiration of the stay of execution provided for in the final judgment, from which she did not appeal. Inasmuch as the stay of issuance of the warrant provided for in the final judgment expired on December 31, 2004, and tenant was not entitled to remain in possession after said date irrespective of whether said payments were made, the issue of whether the warrant could properly issue prior to December 31, 2004 has become moot, and the appeal must be dismissed (see State of New York v General Elec. Co., 103 AD2d 985 [1984]; Augoshe v Sitar, 2002 NY Slip Op 40126[U] [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists]). [*2]
Decision Date: September 16, 2005