| Misko v New York Univ. Med. School |
| 2005 NY Slip Op 51921(U) [10 Misc 3d 129(A)] |
| Decided on November 23, 2005 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Small Claims Part of Civil Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla,
J., dated June 28, 2004, which denied his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.
PER CURIAM:
Order (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), dated June 28, 2004, affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to vacatur of the judgment issued after trial, having failed to submit newly discovered evidence that would have produced a different result had it been submitted in a timely fashion (see CPLR 50l5[a][2]. No showing was made that the supposedly new evidence relied upon by plaintiff was not available at the time of trial despite a diligent effort on his part (Mully Dray, 51 AD2d 660 [l976]).
This constitutes the decision of the Court.
Decision Date: November 23, 2005