Cervini v Greystone Bldg. Co.
2006 NY Slip Op 01374 [26 AD3d 282]
February 23, 2006
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 19, 2006


Joe Cervini, Appellant,
v
Greystone Building Co., Defendant, and Ju Jeung Kim et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson Roman, J.), entered on or about October 12, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, denied so much of plaintiff's motion as sought an order striking the answer of defendants Ju Jeung Kim and Greystone Deli and Grocery, and directed said defendants to appear for depositions by November 10, 2004, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants demonstrated a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with deposition orders inasmuch as Kim was not fluent in English and thus could not understand the notices forwarded by counsel. Under the circumstances, the court providently exercised its discretion in requiring depositions by a date certain, or the preclusion from offering testimony at trial (see Palmenta v Columbia Univ., 266 AD2d 90 [1999]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Williams and Malone, JJ.