| Adams v Danzig |
| 2006 NY Slip Op 02008 [27 AD3d 1204] |
| Decided on March 17, 2006 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 17, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., GORSKI, MARTOCHE, SMITH, AND HAYES, JJ.
276 CA 05-02165
[*1]BRIAN T. ADAMS AND THOMAS B. ADAMS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, ORDER
v
CRAIG DANZIG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Joseph W. Latham, A.J.), entered February 7, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against defendant Craig Danzig.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: March 17, 2006
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court