People v Holloman
2006 NY Slip Op 03989 [29 AD3d 433]
May 18, 2006
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 19, 2006


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Charles Holloman, Appellant.

[*1]Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dora Irizarry, J., at hearing and plea; Arlene Silverman, J., at sentence), rendered September 9, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his suppression claim (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). Were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would, in any event, reject his suppression arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.