[*1]
Batac v Chase Manhattan Bank
2006 NY Slip Op 50031(U) [10 Misc 3d 140(A)]
Decided on January 10, 2006
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on January 10, 2006
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT

PRESENT: SUAREZ, P.J., DAVIS, SCHOENFELD, JJ
.

Arturo P. Batac, Plaintiff-Appellant, 570114/04

against

Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Respondent.


Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered April 19, 2004, after a non-jury trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.


PER CURIAM
Judgment (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on April 19, 2004, affirmed, with $25 costs.

The trial evidence, fairly interpreted, amply supports the court's rejection of plaintiff's claims that defendant breached the terms of its credit card agreement with plaintiff and/or engaged in "deceptive and corrupt business schemes" in connection with plaintiff's credit card account.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

This constitutes the decision and order of this court.
Decision Date: January 10, 2006