[*1]
Monaco v Pole Tech Corp.
2006 NY Slip Op 50301(U) [11 Misc 3d 130(A)]
Decided on February 27, 2006
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on February 27, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : WESTON PATTERSON, J.P., GOLIA and BELEN, JJ
2005-843 K C.

Maureen A. Monaco, Respondent,

against

Pole Tech Corp. and SCOTT H. DAVIS, Appellants.


Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Peter Paul Sweeney, J.), entered December 7, 2004, and from an order of the same court, entered December 23, 2004. The order denied defendants' motion to set aside the verdict as excessive. The judgment, entered upon a jury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $300,000.


Judgment and order affirmed without costs.

Upon a review of the record, we are of the opinion that plaintiff established that she sustained a serious injury. The nature of plaintiff's injuries warranted the jury's award of $100,000 for past pain and suffering and $200,000 for future pain and suffering. Since the award did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see CPLR 5501[c]; Komforti v New York City Tr. Auth., 292 AD2d 569 [2002]; see also Schmidt v Bartolotta, 17 AD3d 162 [2005]), the judgment as well as the order, which denied defendants' motion to set aside the jury verdict, should be affirmed.

Weston Patterson, J.P., Golia and Belen, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: February 27, 2006