| Mirando v Ryce |
| 2006 NY Slip Op 50346(U) [11 Misc 3d 131(A)] |
| Decided on March 7, 2006 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Second District (Steven M. Jaeger, J.), entered March 1, 2004. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,796.15.
Judgment affirmed without costs.
In this small claims action to recover for unpaid rent and damages to the apartment, a review of the record indicates that the determination of the court, awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $1,796.15, was reached based upon a fair interpretation of
the evidence (see e.g. Perez v Garcia, 304 AD2d 544 [2003]). Consequently, we find that substantial justice has been done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (see UDCA 1807).
Rudolph, P.J., Tanenbaum and Lippman, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: March 7, 2006