[*1]
Rodriguez v Edison Parkfast
2006 NY Slip Op 50443(U) [11 Misc 3d 133(A)]
Decided on March 24, 2006
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on March 24, 2006
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT

PRESENT: McCooe, J.P., Gangel-Jacob, Schoenfeld, JJ
570108/05.

Elba Rodriguez, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

Edison Parkfast d/b/a Edison Parking Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered on or about December 15, 2003, after trial, in favor of plaintiff and awarding her damages in the principal sum of $l,750.


PER CURIAM:

Judgment (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered on or about December 15, 2003, reversed, without costs, and judgment directed in favor of defendant dismissing the action.

Considering "the place, the conditions, and the nature of the transaction" (Osborn v Cline, 263 NY 434, 437 [1934]), especially the undisputed fact that plaintiff personally parked and locked her car and retained the keys, defendant may not properly be cast in damages for the property damage sustained to the vehicle in its open-air lot, in the absence of any affirmative showing of negligence on its part (see Ellish v Airport Parking Co., 42 AD2d 174, 177 [1973], affd 34 NY2d 882 [1974]; see generally 19 Lord, Williston on Contracts § 53:14, at 66-67 [4th ed]).
Dismissal of the small claims action thus achieves "substantial justice" consistent with substantive law principles (see CCA 1807).

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: March 24, 2006