| Matter of Feustel v Rosenblum |
| 2007 NY Slip Op 00137 [36 AD3d 615] |
| January 9, 2007 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Noel Feustel, Petitioner, v Scott S. Rosenblum et al., Respondents. |
—[*1]
Farrell Fritz, P.C., Uniondale, N.Y. (John M. Armentano and Rachel A. Scelfo of counsel), for respondents Scott S. Rosenblum, Robert Lynn Cox III, Hugh A. O'Brien III, Bruce A. Rich, Pia Notaro Carroll, and Mario Posillico. Prokop & Prokop, East Setauket, N.Y. (Joseph W. Prokop of counsel), for respondent Incorporated Village of Saltaire.
Proceeding pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 to remove the respondents Scott S. Rosenblum, Robert Lynn Cox III, Hugh A. O'Brien III, Bruce A. Rich, Pia Notaro Carroll, and Mario Posillico from public office in the Incorporated Village of Saltaire.
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The petitioner failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the respondents engaged in any intentional wrongdoing, self-dealing transactions, or gross dereliction of duties. Thus, none of the respondents' conduct rose to the level of malfeasance, misconduct, maladministration, or malversation as to warrant removal from public office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 (see Matter of Gumo v Canzoneri, 276 AD2d 485 [2000]; Matter of Deats v Carpenter, 61 AD2d 320 [1978]; Matter of Pisciotta v Dendievel, 41 AD2d 949 [1973]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.