People v Pruitt
2007 NY Slip Op 01328 [37 AD3d 623]
February 13, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 11, 2007


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Arthur Pruitt, Appellant.

[*1] Arthur Pruitt, Napanoch, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert A. Schwartz and Andrew Fukuda of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 11, 2006 (People v Pruitt, 28 AD3d 588 [2006]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 14, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.