Bowers v BGT, Inc.
2007 NY Slip Op 01501 [37 AD3d 632]
February 20, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 11, 2007


Tomeka Bowers, Respondent,
v
BGT, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[*1] Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants.

Subin Associates, LLP (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac and Kenneth J. Gorman] of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated June 21, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955 [1992]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.