Matter of Best v Thomas
2007 NY Slip Op 04288 [40 AD3d 852]
May 15, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 11, 2007


In the Matter of Hilary A. Best, Petitioner,
v
Charles A. Thomas, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent. Esther E. Best, Nonparty Respondent.

[*1] Hilary A. Best, Forest Hills, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Anthony J. Tomari of counsel), for respondent.

Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Mineola, N.Y. (Sidney Hirschfeld and Felicia B. Rosen of counsel), for nonparty respondent Esther E. Best.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Charles A. Thomas, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to grant the petitioner a writ of habeas corpus in a proceeding entitled People ex rel. Best, on behalf of Best v Thomas, pending under Queens County index No. 22490/97, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of [*2]a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Prudenti, P.J., Fisher, Dillon and Dickerson, JJ., concur.