Zapata v New York City Bd. of Educ.
2007 NY Slip Op 04631 [40 AD3d 1083]
May 29, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, July 11, 2007


Randy Zapata et al., Appellants,
v
New York City Board of Education, Respondent.

—[*1] Napoli Bern Ripka, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Rubin of counsel), for appellants.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Pamela Seider Dolgow and John Hogrogian of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated February 23, 2006, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Lifson and Balkin, JJ., concur.