Pino v Harnischfeger
2007 NY Slip Op 06083 [42 AD3d 985]
July 18, 2007
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, September 12, 2007


Filippo Pino et al., Respondents, v Kurt Harnischfeger, Also Known as Kurt H. Harnischfeger, Individually and Doing Business as Jacobson Development, Also Known as Jacobsen Development, Defendant, and DDS Engineers, LLP, Appellant. (Appeal No. 3.)

[*1] Fix Spindelman Brovitz & Goldman, P.C., Fairport (Russell E. Maines of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Williams & Williams, Rochester (Mitchell T. Williams of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered August 2, 2006. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant DDS Engineers, LLP for reargument/renewal and granted plaintiffs' cross motion to dismiss that defendant's counterclaim and to cancel the notice of pendency filed by that defendant.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Pino v Harnischfeger (42 AD3d 980 [2007]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Smith, Centra, Lunn and Fahey, JJ.