People v Williams
2007 NY Slip Op 08262 [44 AD3d 1080]
October 30, 2007
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 12, 2007


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Timothy Williams, Appellant.

[*1] Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and Laura T. Ross of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered October 16, 2003, convicting him of promoting prison contraband in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant's guilt of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (see Penal Law § 205.25 [2]). Furthermore, resolution of issues of credibility is primarily a matter to be determined by the trier of fact, who saw and heard the witnesses, and his or her determination should be afforded great deference on appeal (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 644-645 [2006]; People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d at 633). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.