| Psychological Practice, P.C. v Utica Mut. Ins. Co. |
| 2007 NY Slip Op 51982(U) [17 Misc 3d 130(A)] |
| Decided on September 4, 2007 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (George J.
Silver, J.), entered May 10, 2006. The order granted defendant's motion to vacate a default
judgment.
Order affirmed without costs.
A motion to vacate a default judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the motion
court (see Matter of Gambardella v Ortov Light., 278 AD2d 494 [2000]) and its
determination will generally not be disturbed unless it can be shown that the court improvidently
exercised its discretion (see Levy Williams Constr. Corp. v United States Fire Ins. Co.,
280 AD2d 650 [2001]). While a delay by the insurance carrier is generally insufficient to
establish a reasonable excuse for a default (see Juseinoski v Board of
Educ. of City of New York, 15 AD3d 353 [2005]; A.B. Med. Servs. PLLC v Citiwide
Auto Leasing Inc., 7 Misc 3d 136[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50786[U] [App Term, 2d &
11th Jud Dists]), where, as here, defendant demonstrates the existence of a question of fact as to
whether the claim at the outset was fraudulent and involves a non-covered incident (see
Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195 [1997]), we find that the court
below did not improvidently exercise its discretion in vacating the default judgment (see A.B.
Med. Servs. PLLC v Citiwide Auto Leasing Inc., 7 Misc 3d 136[A], 2005 NY Slip Op
50786[U], supra).
Pesce, P.J., Weston Patterson and Belen, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: September 04, 2007