Arias-Paulino v Academy Bus Tours, Inc.
2008 NY Slip Op 01637 [48 AD3d 350]
February 26, 2008
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, April 16, 2008


Bernarda Arias-Paulino et al., Appellants,
v
Academy Bus Tours, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[*1] Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York City (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellants.

Maloof, Lebowitz, Connahan & Oleske, P.A., New York City (Jerald F. Oleske of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered December 22, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants' motion to renew and reargue a prior motion to amend their answer to include the affirmative defenses of release and accord and satisfaction and, upon reargument, granted the prior motion and dismissed all plaintiffs' claims up to $1,000,000, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion denied and the claims reinstated.

It is undisputed that defendant Academy Bus Tours, Inc. received the release in July 2002 and did not move to amend its answer until approximately 2½ years later, in 2005, during which time plaintiffs not only litigated the matter extensively but also prepared for and participated in a mediation. Defendants' motion to amend their answer should have been denied upon the ground of laches (see Noy v 765 9th Ave. Corp., 281 AD2d 232 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.