Moncrief v Rosenthal
2008 NY Slip Op 01927 [49 AD3d 511]
March 4, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 14, 2008


John W. Moncrief, Appellant,
v
Maureen Rosenthal et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Annette G. Hasapidis, South Salem, N.Y., for appellant.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Edward J. O'Gorman of counsel) for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Jamieson, J.), entered June 5, 2006, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Appell v Mandel, 296 AD2d 514 [2002]; Singh v Persaud, 269 AD2d 381, 382 [2000]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ., concur.