—[*1] Gannon, Rosenfarb & Moskowitz, New York, N.Y. (James A. Aldag and Nicholas Gisonda of counsel), for appellant. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Irina Kravis appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated March 22, 2007, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In support of her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her, the defendant Irina Kravis made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). However, in opposition to the motion, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact (see id.; Fontecchio v Esposito, 108 AD2d 780 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant's motion. Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Miller, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.