| Matter of Lumsby v Donovan |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 03065 [50 AD3d 318] |
| April 3, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Jean Nelson Lumsby et al.,
Petitioners, v Shaun Donovan, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, et al., Respondents. |
—[*1]
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan Paulson of counsel), for
municipal respondents.
Kagan Lubic Lepper Lewis Gold & Colbert, LLP, New York (Fran I. Lawless of counsel),
for 158 St. Riverside Drive Housing Co., Inc., respondent.
The finding that petitioner mother Jean Nelson Lumsby did not maintain the subject apartment as her primary residence for many years is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Shi Yi Tang v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 29 AD3d 470 [2006]). Since the mother was not occupying the apartment during the relevant period, petitioner Collette Lumsby could not establish succession rights through her (see Matter of Pietropolo v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 39 AD3d 406 [2007]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, McGuire and Acosta, JJ.