Henderson v Shadmi
2008 NY Slip Op 03086 [50 AD3d 341]
April 8, 2008
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, June 18, 2008


Shameika Henderson, Respondent,
v
Eliezer Shadmi, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[*1] McMahon, Martine & Gallagher, New York (Patrick W. Brophy of counsel), for appellant.

Jacob Oresky & Associates, PLLC, Bronx (Ava L. Zelenetsky of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered December 28, 2006, which granted plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's answer to the extent of striking the answer unless defendant appeared for a deposition within 90 days from the date of the order, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, to grant the motion to the extent of precluding defendant from offering evidence at trial on the issue of liability.

There was an insufficient showing of a good faith effort to locate defendant after the court orders requiring that he be produced for a deposition were issued. In these circumstances, we find the more appropriate sanction to be unconditional preclusion. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Friedman, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.