Matter of Caroselli v Lott
2008 NY Slip Op 03206 [50 AD3d 788]
April 8, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, June 18, 2008


In the Matter of Dino Caroselli, Petitioner,
v
Plummer Lott, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent.

[*1] Dino Caroselli, Wallkill, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to direct the respondent, Plummer Lott, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to vacate an order of the same court dated May 17, 2007, denying the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL article 440.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Dillon, JJ., concur.