| Matter of Isabel L. v Biridia L. |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 03510 [50 AD3d 498] |
| April 22, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| In the Matter of Isabel L., Appellant, v Biridia L., Respondent. |
—[*1]
Anne Reiniger, New York, for respondent.
Carol Sherman, The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn (Janet Neustaetter of counsel), Law
Guardian.
While an evidentiary hearing was required (cf. Alix A. v Erika H., 45 AD3d 394 [2007]), Gilbert has now been living uneventfully with respondent for the past two years, and we see no reason to remit the matter for a hearing at this point, particularly where the record supports the court's finding that awarding custody to respondent was in the children's best interests (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173-174 [1982]; Skidelsky v Skidelsky, 279 AD2d 356 [2001]; Melnitzky v Melnitzky, 278 AD2d 2 [2000]).
That portion of the order that advised respondent to arrange for grandparent and sibling visitation has been superseded by an order of visitation, rendering academic this aspect of the appeal (see Matter of Maria Raquel L., 36 AD3d 425 [2007]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, McGuire and Acosta, JJ.