People ex rel. Sussman v Dutchess County Dist. Attorney
2008 NY Slip Op 06578 [54 AD3d 351]
August 5, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, September 24, 2008


The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael H. Sussman, on Behalf of Robert Watson, Petitioner,
v
Dutchess County District Attorney, Respondent.

—[*1] Sussman & Watkins, Goshen, N.Y. (Michael H. Sussman pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

William G. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), respondent pro se.

Writ of habeas corpus to restore Robert Watson, the defendant in a criminal action entitled People v Robert Watson pending in the County Court, Dutchess County, under indictment No. 125/06, to the original conditions of his release on bail.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the County Court, Dutchess County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Miller, Covello and Belen, JJ., concur.