Matter of Fortuniewicz v Cohen
2008 NY Slip Op 07128 [54 AD3d 952]
September 23, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, October 29, 2008


In the Matter of John P. Fortuniewicz, Petitioner,
v
Jeffrey A. Cohen, as Judge of the Westchester County Court, Respondent.

[*1] Charles A. Giulini, Jr., New York, N.Y., for petitioner.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Susan Anspach of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Jeffrey A. Cohen, dated February 25, 2008, which, upon renewal, adhered to his prior determination dated October 31, 2007, denying the petitioner's application for a pistol permit.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Penal Law § 400.00 (1) provides, inter alia, that no firearm license shall be issued until after an investigation and a finding that all statements on the application are true. A county licensing officer has broad discretionary authority in determining whether to issue a permit (see Matter of Denora v Safir, 274 AD2d 478 [2000]; Matter of Parker v Nastasi, 97 AD2d 547 [1983], affd 62 NY2d 714 [1984]). Here, the petitioner undisputedly failed to disclose a prior arrest and prior conviction in his application for a pistol permit. As such, the respondent Jeffrey A. Cohen, a County Court Judge acting in his administrative capacity as the county licensing officer (see Penal Law § 265.00 [10]), did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in denying the petitioner's application based on those untruths (see Penal Law § 400.00 [1]; Matter of Gonzalez v Lawrence, 36 AD3d 807 [2007]; Matter of Papineau v Martusewicz, 35 AD3d 1214 [2006]; Matter of Hanna v Police Dept. of County of Nassau, 205 AD2d 689 [1994]; Matter of Conciatori v Brown, 201 AD2d 323 [1994]; Matter of Westfall v Lange, 175 AD2d 290 [1991]; Matter of Willis v Treder, 127 AD2d 667 [1987]). [*2]

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.