S.P.Q.R. Co., Inc. v United Rockland Stairs, Inc.
2008 NY Slip Op 09772 [57 AD3d 642]
December 9, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 11, 2009


mS.P.Q.R. Co., Inc., et al., Respondents,
v
United Rockland Stairs, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[*1] Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C., Chestnut Ridge, N.Y. (Reginald H. Rutishauser of counsel), for appellant.

Feerick Lynch MacCartney PLLC, Nyack, N.Y. (Phyllis A. Ingram of counsel), for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendant United Rockland Stairs, Inc., from trespassing on a certain disputed parcel of real property and to compel that defendant to remove a fence from that property, the defendant United Rockland Stairs, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated October 18, 2007, which, upon an order of the same court dated May 21, 2007, inter alia, granting its motion for a preliminary injunction, directed it to post an undertaking in the amount of $1,500,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, "[w]e find no basis on this record to disturb the amount of the undertaking fixed by the Supreme Court to compensate the [plaintiffs] for damages incurred by reason of the injunction in the event of a final determination that the [defendant was] not entitled to injunctive relief. The fixing of the amount of an undertaking is a matter within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court, and its determination will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of that discretion" (Ujueta v Euro-Quest Corp., 29 AD3d 895, 896 [2006] [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, at the time the amount of the undertaking was fixed, it was rationally related to the amount of potential damages that the plaintiffs established they might sustain (see CPLR 6312 [b]; Ujueta v Euro-Quest Corp., 29 AD3d at 896; Blueberries Gourmet v Aris Realty Corp., 255 AD2d 348, 350 [1998]; cf. Access Med. Group, P.C. v Straus Family Capital Group, LLC, 44 [*2]AD3d 975 [2007]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.