Pantaleo v New Image Gymnastic Academy, Inc.
2008 NY Slip Op 09970 [57 AD3d 749]
December 16, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 11, 2009


Rebecca Pantaleo et al., Appellants,
v
New Image Gymnastic Academy, Inc., Doing Business as New Image Gymnastics, et al., Respondents.

[*1] Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (John V. Decolator of counsel), for appellants.

Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Steven H. Rosenfeld and Randee H. Arem of counsel), for respondent New Image Gymnastic Academy, Inc., doing business as New Image Gymnastics.

John T. Ryan, Riverhead, N.Y. (Robert F. Horvat of counsel), for respondent Deary's Gymnastics.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), dated April 23, 2007, which granted the separate motions of the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 31051(U).]