Feliciano v Malik
2008 NY Slip Op 10123 [57 AD3d 838]
December 23, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 11, 2009


Jennifer Feliciano, Respondent,
v
Mohammad Malik et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[*1] Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants.

Hecht, Kleeger, Pintel & Damashek, New York, N.Y. (Ephrem Wertenteil of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Mohammad Malik and Osman Jami appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated January 14, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants' motion for summary judgment (see CPLR 3212). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Miller, Dickerson and Eng, JJ., concur.