[*1]
Feis v Law Offs. of Edward R. Curtin
2008 NY Slip Op 50481(U) [19 Misc 3d 126(A)]
Decided on March 14, 2008
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on March 14, 2008
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT

PRESENT: DAVIS, J.P., SCHOENFELD, HEITLER, JJ

570710/07.

Richard S. Feis, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

Law Offices of Edward R. Curtin, Defendant-Appellant, -and- Robert I. Goodman, Defendant. Heyward Davis, Plaintiff-Respondent, NY County Clerk's No. 570782/07 Law Offices of Edward R. Curtin, Defendant-Appellant, Calendar No. 07-477 -and- Robert I. Goodman, Defendant.


In consolidated actions, defendant Law Offices of Edward R. Curtin appeals from two judgments of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Debra Rose Samuels, J.), entered on or about January 10, 2007, in favor of plaintiffs and awarding them damages.


Per Curiam:

Judgments (Debra Rose Samuels, J.), entered on or about January 10, 2007, affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that the trial court applied the appropriate rules and principles of substantive law, and achieved "substantial justice" (CCA 1804, 1807) in awarding plaintiffs recovery for the court reporting services shown to have been rendered (see Urban Court Reporting v Davis, 158 AD2d 401 [1990]). [*2]

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: March 14, 2008