| Rodriguez v Mathews |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 50913(U) [19 Misc 3d 140(A)] |
| Decided on April 30, 2008 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Plaintiff, as limited by her brief, appeals from so much of a judgment of the Small Claims
Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered on
or about September 13, 2006, after trial, as limited her recovery of damages to the principal sum
of $250.
PER CURIAM:
Judgment (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered on or about
On this slender record, and in view of the advanced age and ill health of plaintiff's dog at the time of the incident and plaintiff's nebulous showing of medical expenses attributable to the "trauma" allegedly experienced by the animal as a result of the near attack by defendant's dog, we are satisfied that the damage award issued to plaintiff was neither inadequate nor inconsistent with the mandate of "substantial justice" (CCA 1807). In the absence of a cross appeal by defendant, we do not address the propriety of the trial court's (implicit) liability determination.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE
COURT.
Decision Date: April 30, 2008