[*1]
Wei Tan Lao v Francis
2008 NY Slip Op 51076(U) [19 Misc 3d 143(A)]
Decided on May 30, 2008
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on May 30, 2008
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT

PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., DAVIS, SCHOENFELD, JJ
570015/08.

Wei Tan Lao and Zhu Shen Huang, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

against

Shanika D. Francis, Defendant-Respondent.


Plaintiffs appeal 1) from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, dated October 12, 2007 (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), which granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment, and 2) from an order of the same court (Debra R. Samuels, J.), dated January 16, 2008, which, inter alia, directed plaintiffs to file a new notice of trial.


PER CURIAM.

Orders dated October 12, 2007 (Arlene P. Bluth, J.) and January 16, 2008 (Debra R. Samuels, J.), affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs.

Given the judicial preference for resolving cases on the merits (see Atkins v Malota, 1 AD3d 294 [2003], lv dismissed 3 NY3d 703 [2004]), the existence of possible meritorious defenses to plaintiff's negligence claim, and the absence of any indication that defendant's defaults at the pretrial conference or the ensuing inquest were willful, the motion court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendant vacatur relief. Nor may plaintiff now seek to enforce the initial May 3, 2006 judgment issued upon defendant's unintended default in answering the complaint, in view of the express provisions of the parties' August 16, 2006 so-ordered stipulation precluding such enforcement, and the extensive litigation course thereafter charted by the parties.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: May 30, 2008