Weisburst v Dreifus
2009 NY Slip Op 00005 [58 AD3d 402]
January 6, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 11, 2009


Sanford I. Weisburst, Appellant,
v
Joanna Dreifus, Respondent.

[*1] Sanford I. Weisburst, New York, appellant pro se.

Chemtob Moss Forman & Talbert, LLP, New York (Susan M. Moss of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered June 25, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for an interim award of attorney's fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The record does not show that defendant has significantly greater financial resources at her disposal than plaintiff has (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; O'Shea v O'Shea, 93 NY2d 187, 190 [1999]; CharpiÉ v CharpiÉ, 271 AD2d 169 [2000]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contention and find it unavailing. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.