People v Amitrano
2009 NY Slip Op 01710 [60 AD3d 460]
March 10, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 6, 2009


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Anthony Amitrano, Appellant.

[*1] Howard R. Birnbach, Great Neck, for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Gina Mignola of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), rendered May 3, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of two months, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There was ample evidence to establish defendant's role in attacking the victim.

The court provided suitable remedies for the People's loss of certain police reports (see People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940 [1988]). The court's adverse inference charge conveyed the proper standards, including the permissive nature of such an inference (see People v Brister, 239 AD2d 513 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 938 [1997]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ. [See 15 Misc 3d 1126(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 50851(U).]