Sotomayor v Yarmouth Lbr.
2009 NY Slip Op 01974 [60 AD3d 840]
March 17, 2009
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, May 6, 2009


Joe Sotomayor, Appellant,
v
Yarmouth Lumber et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Law Office of Donald Friedman, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mitchell Gorkin of counsel), for appellant.

Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf LLP, New York, N.Y. (Martin B. Adams of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated May 14, 2008, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.