| Chavez v City of New York |
| 2009 NY Slip Op 04179 [62 AD3d 929] |
| May 26, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| Rosario Chavez, Respondent, v City of New York, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Madeline Chocolates Novelties, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Rosario Chavez, Respondent, v New York City Industrial Development Agency, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.) (Action No. 2.) |
—[*1]
Morenus, Conway, Goren & Brandman, Melville, N.Y. (Brian S. Brandman of counsel), for
appellant New York City Industrial Development Agency.
Pagan Law Firm, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Tania M. Pagan of counsel), for
plaintiff-respondent.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Stephen J. McGrath, Terrence
Kossegi, and Victoria Scalzo of counsel), for defendant third-party
plaintiff-respondent.
Separate appeals by Madeline Chocolates Novelties, Inc., the third-party defendant in action No. 1, and New York City Industrial Development Agency, a defendant in action No. 2, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kerrigan, J.), dated February 6, 2008.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Kerrigan at the Supreme Court. Fisher, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.