Niagara Venture v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency
2009 NY Slip Op 04650 [63 AD3d 1664]
June 5, 2009
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009


The Niagara Venture, Appellant, v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Dino DiCienzo et al., Respondents,
v
Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) (Appeal No. 3.)

—[*1] Law Offices of John P. Bartolomei & Associates, Niagara Falls (John P. Bartolomei of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas M. O'Donnell, Corporation Counsel, Niagara Falls (Richard Zucco of counsel), for defendants-respondents.

Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo (Cynthia L. Thompson of counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered June 23, 2008. The order denied the motion of The Niagara Venture for leave to reargue or renew the denial of its motion to consolidate action Nos. 1 and 2.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in DiCienzo v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency (63 AD3d — [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.