Matter of Hodge v Richardson
2009 NY Slip Op 09308 [68 AD3d 555]
December 15, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010


In the Matter of Martin Hodge, Petitioner,
v
Clark V. Richardson, Respondent.

[*1] Martin Hodge, petitioner pro se.

Michael Colodner, New York (John Eiseman of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.